Research

Specific questions
about treatment

Measuring outcome

References

Publications

 

Research

Specific questions about treatment

 
 


Inpatient vs outpatient treatment [Williams et al. 1996, 1999]
From the start of the unit for several years, patients who agreed to be randomised to inpatient or outpatient treatment were entered into a trial comparing those treatments with one another and with no treatment while waiting for admission (for 3 months only). While both groups benefitted on all measures taken at one month, over 6 and 12 months those who had inpatient treatment did better on some measures, particularly those to do with physical function and with returning to doctors for further treatment. We subsequently compared those patients who agreed to be randomised with those who were treated at the same time as inpatient or outpatients but chose which treatment they had, and the results were much the same. This was an important demonstration that treatment in general was as good as in the rather special trial.

Drug reduction [Ralphs et al.]
Another study examined whether patients who were cut down from their opioid dose on a cocktail (when they knew they were reducing, but not exactly which day) did better or worse than those who cut down their tablets by agreed amounts on specified days. In fact, those who took a cocktail were more likely to be off all opioids by the time they left four week inpatient treatment, but more likely to be back on them by follow-up, even though at a lower dose. So in the longer term, patients managed better if they were in control of their drug reduction, using a plan drawn up with medical and nursing staff, and this is what almost all patients now do.

Dropout [Coughlan et al.]
A few patients drop out of treatment for a variety of reasons, and since places on the programme are precious, it would help to be able to reduce this. When we investigated it, we found that three things predicted that a patient would drop out: a combination of low confidence in being able to manage despite pain and low current mobility; and being the odd one out, such as the only one with abdominal pain among a group with back pain, or the only one under 30 in a group of over-50s. That doesn't mean that all such patients dropped out, only that they were more likely to do so. As a result, we tried not to have "odd ones out" in the groups we admitted, and to offer more support to those with low confidence. Dropout rate subsequently fell to under 5% of patients admitted.

Return to work [Richardson et al., Adams & Williams]
One of the questions we are often asked, particularly by doctors, is whether patients return to work. Of course, that can only apply to those who are in work or are prevented from being in work because of pain, and there are many homemakers and retired people among our patients to whom it doesn't apply. We found that patients who are working when they are admitted do go back to work and find it easier, while some who were not working start training, or voluntary or paid work, often on a part-time basis at least initially. A recent study of patients with upper limb pain ("repetitive strain injury") showed that those who returned to work were not necessarily fitter or in less pain than those who didn't, but they were more optimistic about support available from work colleagues, managers, and Department of Employment resources, and had often had better experience of such support before they came to INPUT than those who were rather pessimistic about the help and understanding they would receive at work. This latter study was funded by the South Thames NHS Executive R&D Directorate.

 

References

Williams ACdeC, Richardson PH, Nicholas MK, Pither CE, Harding VR, Ridout KL, Ralphs JA, Richardson IH, Justins DM, Chamberlain JH (1996). Inpatient vs. outpatient pain management: results of a randomised controlled trial. Pain 66 13-22.

Williams ACdeC, Nicholas MK, Richardson PH, Pither CE, Fernandes J (1999) Generalizing from a controlled trial: the effects of patient preference versus randomization on the outcome of inpatient versus outpatient chronic pain management. Pain 83, 57-65.

Ralphs JA, Williams ACdeC, Richardson PH, Pither CE, Nicholas MK (1994). Opiate reduction in chronic pain patients: a comparison of patient-controlled reduction and staff controlled cocktail methods. Pain 56 279-288.

Coughlan GM, Ridout KL, Williams ACdeC, Richardson PH (1995). Attrition from a pain management programme. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 34 471-479.

Richardson IH, Richardson PH, Williams ACdeC, Featherstone J, Harding VR (1994). The effects of a cognitive-behavioural pain management programme on the quality of work and employment status of severely impaired chronic pain patients. Disability and Rehabilitation 16, 26-34.

Adams JH, Williams ACdeC (2003). What affects return to work for graduates of a pain management programme with chronic upper limb pain? Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 13: 91-106.



What is INPUT? I What is Pain Management? I Programmes for Patients I Reading & FAQs I INPUT Appeal
Publications I Research I Education I Jobs I Links I Home I Contact us I Sitemap

© INPUT Pain Management 2004 I Disclaimer